Too tired to take offense: When depletion promotes forgiveness

نویسندگان

  • Sarah C.E. Stanton
  • Eli J. Finkel
چکیده

a r t i c l e i n f o Although self-regulatory depletion has a broad range of adverse consequences, recent research has established that it can yield prosocial outcomes under certain circumstances. The present experiment examined the interaction between depletion and offense severity on forgiveness of romantic offenses. Consistent with prior research, results revealed that depleted (vs. non-depleted) individuals were less forgiving of severe offenses. In a counter-intuitive reversal, however, depleted (vs. non-depleted) individuals were more forgiving of mild offenses. This crossover interaction effect was mediated by perception of offense severity, suggesting that depleted individuals may be especially forgiving of mild offenses because they are simply too tired to take offense at their partner's bad behavior. These findings identify one important instance in which depletion can promote salutary relationship processes. Introduction Imagine returning home after an exhausting day to a partner who treats you in either a severely or mildly negative manner. How would you evaluate the severity of your partner's bad behavior, and how likely would you be to forgive it? In the present research, we test the hypotheses that (a) depleted (vs. non-depleted) individuals will be less forgiving of severe offenses, but more forgiving of mild offenses; and (b) this Depletion × Offense Type interaction will be mediated by individuals' perceptions of offense severity. The negative consequences of self-regulation failure, the process by which individuals fail to act in accord with their goals (Baumeister, Vohs, & Tice, 2007), are legion. Poor self-regulatory ability, whether measured at a dispositional level or manipulated through depletion procedures, impairs a broad range of interpersonal processes and outcomes (for a review see Luchies, Finkel, & Fitzsimons, 2011). For example, people with low (vs. high) dispositional self-regulatory strength are more likely to be unfaithful to their romantic partner Similarly, individuals involved in relationships whose self-regulatory resources have been experimentally depleted tend to show as much interest in attractive alternatives as single individuals do (Ritter, Karremans, & van Schie, 2010) and are especially aggressive in response to partner provocation (Finkel et al., 2009). Of particular relevance to the present research, poor self-regulation makes individuals less forgiving when confronting offenses enacted by and research has demonstrated that depleted self-regulatory strength undermines the ability to forgive (or " accommodate ") in response to hurtful or inconsiderate partner behaviors (Finkel & Campbell, 2001). Individuals with low dispositional self-regulatory strength also experience more ruminative thoughts about severe …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Too Proud to Let Go: Narcissistic Entitlement as a Barrier to Forgiveness

Narcissistic entitlement impedes forgiveness in ways not captured by other robust predictors (e.g., offense severity, apology, relationship closeness, religiosity, Big Five personality factors), as demonstrated in 6 studies. Narcissistic entitlement involves expectations of special treatment and preoccupation with defending one’s rights. In Study 1, entitlement predicted less forgiveness and gr...

متن کامل

Victim and offender accounts of interpersonal conflict: autobiographical narratives of forgiveness and unforgiveness.

Participants wrote 2 narratives that described an incident in which they angered or hurt someone (offender) or in which someone angered or hurt them (victim) and the offense was forgiven or not forgiven. Victims portrayed the offense as continuing (open), and offenders portrayed the offense as over (closed). Forgiveness narratives portrayed offenses as closed and with positive outcomes; however...

متن کامل

Religion and unforgivable offenses.

The value of forgiveness is emphasized in many religions, but little is known about how members of distinct religious cultures differ in their views of forgiveness. We hypothesized and found that Jews would agree more than Protestants that certain offenses are unforgivable and that religious commitment would be more negatively correlated with belief in unforgivable offenses among Protestants th...

متن کامل

Too proud to let go: narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness.

Narcissistic entitlement impedes forgiveness in ways not captured by other robust predictors (e.g., offense severity, apology, relationship closeness, religiosity, Big Five personality factors), as demonstrated in 6 studies. Narcissistic entitlement involves expectations of special treatment and preoccupation with defending one's rights. In Study 1, entitlement predicted less forgiveness and gr...

متن کامل

Forgive and Forget: Differences between Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness

To forgive and forget is a well-known idiom, which has rarely been looked at empirically. In the current experiment, we investigated differences between emotional and decisional forgiveness on forgetting. The present study provides the first empirical support that emotional forgiveness has a strong influence on subsequent incidental forgetting. Specifically, our results demonstrate that emotion...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012